We now find ourselves being governed by politicians and appointed federal and state judges, who embrace the venomous fundamentals of globalism. But no one seems to notice that the topic is not even being debated. Or does anyone care?
By Gary Miller
October 27, 2004
Why No Debate Over Globalism?
Other than President Bush getting on John Kerry's case about his proposed handling of our foreign policy problems as passing a "global test," nobody else has even come close to acknowledging, let alone debating the topic of globalism.
Radio talk show host, Michael Savage, has stated repeatedly... "Bush is no statesman, but he's the best thing we have going right now." Very sad, but true.
Although the Bush family had some inclination toward globalism in the past, this year’s favorite son of globalism, by unanimous decision, is John F. Kerry.
There is so much at stake in this 2004 election in many realms of both moral and "global" consequences. The possibility of appointing as many as THREE Supreme Court judges by whoever occupies the White House next term, opens the door for either a legal catastrophe or a clear chance to better our place in history.
We also don't need another Presidential cabinet like slick Willy Clinton put into power. Remember Janet Reno and Madeleine Albright. Then you must remember the tragedy at Waco and Albright’s bungled statesmanship in denying the atrocities committed by Saddam Hussein against the children and entire population of Iraq.
With Kerry in the White House, it would even be worse. I’ll admit that I surely don't have all the answers, but I just can't help thinking about the history of American politics. Although it’s a fact that there were most certainly some outright crooks and scoundrels who campaigned and actually got elected during our early election years (100-200 years ago), can you imagine the public outcry back then if a candidate would have even hinted that he supported a woman's RIGHT to seek an ABORTION? Or would they dare to mention their support of the HOMOSEXUAL lifestyle? I think not!
The campaign issues of today could not even have been discussed in mixed company in the days when our nation was founded. I would also venture to say that a candidate during either the WWII or Korean war eras would not have based their platform on such immoral concepts, no matter whether a democrat or republican. Our general population then was geared to higher values and loyalty to our flag and nation.
Our patriots who fought and died at Valley Forge, Lexington, and the Alamo, did not enlist because the Army or Militia offered a great ‘health care’ plan or college credits. It was strictly a matter of HONOR.
In his self-seeking scheme to attain power, as typical of modern-day democrats, John Kerry has resorted to treasonous lies in his vile attack upon an incumbent President. But with the collaboration of the news media, how can a very naive general public discern the truth? The wheels of globalism have been set in motion for decades now. We have been programmed into accepting it’s intrusion and foreign influence into our daily lives. The process has been intentionally slow. It has been carefully planned as to not incite fear or revolt.
From our Revolutionary war, through all the wars that followed, our statesmen and our men and women in the military, answered the call to war for many noble causes. They, and our citizens on the home front, endured almost unbearable hardships. But the priority of issues in [their] political debates would never have included such topics as "affirmative action" or "environmental laws." Their arguments would have been centered around more relevant issues pertaining to the very SOVEREIGNTY of the United States, and the defense of our borders. The goals of both political parties back then would have been to maintain the Constitution of The United States at all costs. They never would have allowed a gang of renegade federal judges to strike down our most sacred laws, only to replace them with communist-leaning fundamentals. Our nation's founders and patriots would never have allowed FOREIGN “OBSERVERS” to monitor OUR ELECTIONS! They would never have permitted our federal judges to base their rulings on FOREIGN PRECEDENTS.
We now find ourselves being governed by politicians and appointed federal and state judges, who embrace the venomous fundamentals of globalism. But no one seems to notice that the topic is not even being debated. Or does anyone care?
Like the women's libbers used to say...”you’ve come a long way baby!” History will reveal, I'm sorry to say, that the "long way" has been the WRONG WAY!
May our God, in His infinite mercy, find a way to Bless America again. I pray He will open our eyes to the truth before we reach the point of no return.
Gary Miller
* You can find additional views on this topic in the
Kerry or Bush commentary written by Al Colombo.