5. Holding the Camera Steady. This is an area that has been treated in volumes of written word, but it is still one of the most discussed areas among photographers. So with your permission, I'll ramble a bit. Holding a camera steady isn't as critical when using flash indoors as it is when using available light, either outdoors or indoors. But if you can manage it, the quality of just plain normal photos will improve immensely. And there is the added benefit of being able to achieve some effects not attainable otherwise, either by holding the camera steadier or, in some cases, actually moving it while shooting. Wanna waste a couple shots of film to find out just how blurry zoom or telephoto shots can be? Next time you're outside with a camera aim it at a distant scene with the lens set to take in the largest area possible (zoomed out). Hold the camera while looking at the scene, but pan the camera at a moderate pace, like a videographer does of scenic shots, while you click the shutter. Now zoom the lens in on the subject so you get a lot "closer" to it and do the same thing, at about the same pan speed. When you get the prints back, the one that was zoomed in will be considerably blurrier than the wide shot. The degree of blur will partially depend on the shutter speed, but also on the amount of "telephoto" effect. The faster the shutter speed, the less the blur, and the greater the tele effect, the more the blur. So it's imperative to use a fast shutter speed or, in lieu of that, have a steady camera, when taking the tele shots. Note: If you try this experiment on a bright day, pan fairly fast to better see the effect. By the way, when you drop the film off for processing tell them to print every frame. Sometimes they omit the ones that are way out of kahooey. But if they don't print them, you can still look at the negs to see the effect. So, if possible, use a faster film, and thereby a faster shutter speed, for any telephoto or zoomed in shots you want to take. But if you can't do that, all is not lost. How do you steady a camera? Well, some people have tripods. There are actually some fairly good ones around for a reasonable price. One thing though. Make sure you can tilt the camera sideways if you want to. Some video tripods aren't bad at all for the money, but you can't tilt some of them sideways to take vertical shots. But if you already have one of these, don't despair. If you want the camera positioned to take a vertical shot, you can turn the camera 90 degrees where it attaches to the tripod platform and then swing the whole thing over to the side. You will have to leave the camera a tad loose so you can turn it to crop the shot, but it will work in a pinch. But, if you're like me, you hate to tote something around that you probably won't have to use (famous last words). So what do you do if you have to steady the camera and don't have a tripod? There's always something nearby that will help. I've taken time exposures of one to ten seconds with the camera resting on fire hydrants, garbage cans, car hoods or roofs, ladders, stumps, rocks, fences, or anything else that will act as a stable, flat surface. To adjust the angle of the camera, rest it partly on a wallet, key pouch, twig, whatever is handy. One of the greatest accessories a photog can carry is a plain ol' beanbag, large enough to cover the whole bottom of the camera. Laying the camera right on the ground might include a little out-of-focus grass in the lower part of the shot, adding a little interest and providing a pet's eye view of a scene. Another thing that works surprisingly well (although some people think this idea stinks) is to rest the camera inside a shoe. It can be munged around and easily adjusted to frame the image just like you want it. Trouble is that when you get down to look through the camera, you may pass out. Oh well. Can't have everything! If your camera has a timer and the subject isn't moving, just set that to trip the shutter for you. The camera will sit there for around 10 seconds and then the shutter will pop, all without you having to touch it at all. If you don't have a timer on your camera, try to press down on the camera so it's firmly seated on whatever you're using and gently press the shutter release with a finger, remaining as still as possible while the shutter is open. A cable release also works great, but a lot of people don't have those lying around. They're actually fairly inexpensive at a camera shop. But for just low light photos of people, like on heavily overcast days or in wooded areas, or shots where you're zoomed out to the max, try leaning the camera body against a tree or pole. Or you can lean up against a wall or tree yourself with your head pressed firmly back, hold the camera pressed tight to your forehead, nose, and cheeks, and steady it that way. If you must stand in the open, try keeping your arms in tight against your body and your feet apart when you shoot. Or sit down with your knees up toward your face and rest your camera and forearms on your knees. You can also either stand against, or lay on the hood of a car, table, whatever, with your elbows resting on the whatever. Then press the camera against your face or forehead, gripping it like you're trying to keep it away from a mugger, and shoot. In general, the less you're able to move, and the firmer the grip you have on the camera, the steadier it is. Let's see, what else can we use in a pinch? Gotta broom? Or rake, shovel, baseball bat, tennis racket? You've seen workmen leaning on a shovel or rake to steady themselves while resting. You can use that little trick to steady a camera too. I've grabbed brooms and rested my hands and camera on the end of the handle to steady myself while shooting in low light. Works like a champ! You might want to play around to find a comfortable way to hold the camera and the end of the "helper" together. Or you can simply press the camera down on the end of the handle. That works remarkably well as a camera steady. Another trick is to tie a rope or heavy string to the camera, step on the end of it, and lift up on the camera and stretch it tight as you shoot. I've never done this, but I understand it works very well in a pinch. Well, since I've done it a few times before, let's do it again. Instead of trying to get the sharpest image possible, how can we use blur to advantage? Blur can be a great way to suggest movement in a still photo. A shot of a car or child on a bicycle can be much more effective if it shows some "movement". By following the subject as it moves by and totally disregarding whatever is behind it, the car or child will be rendered in sharp focus, but the background will be streaked and give the illusion of speed or movement. You often see sports shots like this, and it's very effective. Another tactic has been used by a great number of photogs, but it's so darn nice that it hasn't reached the rank of "cliche" yet, is to shoot water with a slower shutter speed. A waterfall or stream shot at a half second or longer instead of 1/500 second will create a soft, flowing image instead of showing the texture of the water. This is particularly effective if there are people in the shot, but they should remain fairly still during the exposure so they aren't blurred too, unless you want that. Here again, rules can often be broken to yield a better product.